United States v. Stubblefield
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Mark Stubblefield’s pro se Motion [109] to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant claims he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel and requests that the Court order an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he is entitled to relief under § 2255. Upon consideration of the Motion and supporting Memorandum [109], the Government’s Opposition [114], the defendant’s Reply [116], the entire record herein, and the applicable law, the Court will deny the Motion for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Mark StubblefieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. SuggsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. AbassDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- United States v. LeakeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.