Legal Opinion

People v. Pennick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court erred in permitting a codefendant to testify during the prosecutor’s direct case regarding the contents of a letter that was not produced. The admission of that testimony violates the "best evidence rule”, which "requires that one who desires to prove the contents of a writing, do so by producing the writing itself unless sufficient reason is shown for its absence” (People v Colon, 281 App Div 354, 356; see also, Richardson, Evidence § 568 [Prince 10th ed]). The court further erred in denying defendant’s request to charge the jury that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. RypinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API