Legal Opinion
Slater Trust Co. v. Randolph-Macon Coal Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided June 9, 1908No. 1,213PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge.
The defendant Randolph-Macon Company is not in court, the attempted service on that defendant having been set aside by order of court. All the other defendants are in court, and each has demurred. They assert: First. That the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Second. That the complainant has a plain, adequate, complete, and compensatory remedy at law. Third. That the defendant Randolph-Macon Coal Company is a necessary party for the determination of this controversy.
The allegations of the bill are in brief as follows: That the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Wormley v. WormleySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Coal Co. v. BlatchfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Williams v. BankheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harff v. KerkorianCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
- Durham v. Wichita Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Cherry v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Lawrence v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
- City of Birmingham v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940