Legal Opinion

Rambush Decorating Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 4, 1960No. C.D. 2204Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as a “Reredos” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 232(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, for—

Marble, breccia, and onyx, wholly or partly manufactured into monuments, benches, vases, and other articles, and articles of which these substances or any of them is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for.

The protest claim is for free entry of the reredos under the provision in paragraph 1774 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daprato Statuary Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Bernardini Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Berg Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API