Legal Opinion
City of Owasso v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 149
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 15, 2014No. 111,441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
[ 1 Defendants/Appellants Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge #149, and Mike Denton (respectively, Lodge and Denton, or collectively, Defendants), seek review of an order of the trial court vacating a decision of an arbitrator as contrary to public policy. In this appeal, Defendants complain the parties' collective bargaining agreement expressly proscribes district court review of an arbitrator's decision, and the trial court erred as a matter of both fact and law in holding the arbitrator's decision violated public policy.
1 2 Defendant Mike Denton worked for the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CITY OF GUTHRIE v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- CITY OF TULSA v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 93Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- City of Guthrie v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 105Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 93Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 93Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.