Legal Opinion

Melvin E. Jackson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2015No. 13-CF-1450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Senior Judge:

Found guilty by the court of multiple firearms offenses on stipulated facts, appellant argues that his motion to suppress the loaded revolver seized from him during a pat-down was wrongly denied, because in stopping him the police relied on an anonymous 911 telephone tip that, he contends, did not furnish the reasonable suspicion necessary for a lawful stop. Largely on the basis of Prado Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1683, 188 L.Ed.2d 680 (2014), we affirm.

I

Officer Lina of the Metropolitan Police Department testified that on June 13, 2013, around 8:30…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Tyrone Wade v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API