Melvin E. Jackson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
Found guilty by the court of multiple firearms offenses on stipulated facts, appellant argues that his motion to suppress the loaded revolver seized from him during a pat-down was wrongly denied, because in stopping him the police relied on an anonymous 911 telephone tip that, he contends, did not furnish the reasonable suspicion necessary for a lawful stop. Largely on the basis of Prado Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1683, 188 L.Ed.2d 680 (2014), we affirm.
I
Officer Lina of the Metropolitan Police Department testified that on June 13, 2013, around 8:30…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Tyrone Wade v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.