Legal Opinion

United States v. Briggs

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2003No. 02-51248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

The attorney appointed to represent Windell Joe Briggs on appeal has request*404ed leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Briggs has received a copy of counsel’s motion and has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API