Legal Opinion
Nordberg v. Lord, Day & Lord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1985No. 84 Civ. 3045 (DNE)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Paul C. Nordberg and Joseph P. Doherty (“Plaintiffs”), shareholders in Scarburgh Co. (“Scarburgh”), commenced this civil RICO1 action, pro se, against Scarburgh, its officers and directors, other major Scar-burgh shareholders, several insurance companies, four law firms and a number of individual attorneys. Jurisdiction is predicated on 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a) and 1965 and this court’s pendent jurisdiction. Defendants have moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,038 Randolph Phillips v. John E. Tobin, Ralph K. Gottshall, and Alleghany CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Village at Camelback Property Owners Assn. Inc. v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Manson v. StacescuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Manson v. StacescuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.