Legal Opinion

Knox v. Simmons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1992No. 60511PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Judge.

Plaintiff in this personal injury case appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which applied additur to raise the amount of the jury verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff contends that: (1) additur was inappropriate in that he should have been granted a new trial; (2) the trial court erred in limiting the testimony of plaintiff’s expert witness; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support two of the instructions submitted. We affirm.

The case arises from a collision on or near a single-lane bridge on a gravel road between a passenger car and a dump truck hauling a load of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Skadal v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Grodsky v. Consolidated Bag Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Housman v. FiddymentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Larabee v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Artstein Ex Rel. Artstein v. Pallo Ex Rel. PalloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Badahman v. Catering St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Massman Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Berra v. DanterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Strong v. American Cyanamid Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bishop v. CumminesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API