Legal Opinion

Mather v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1905No. 5598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered January 23, 1905, dismissing an action to- recover for services as stenographer for the grand jury, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, O. J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the court below, alleging that he had been employed by the board of county commissioners of King county to act as stenographer for the grand jury; that, under such employment, he rendered services which were a necessary expense, and were reasonably worth $411.51; that the board of county com* missioners of said county audited, allowed, and paid his claim for such services for the month of January, 1903, amounting to the sum of $211.40, but refused to allow for such services for the months of February and March, and rejected plaintiff’s claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Smith v. LampingWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Northwestern Improvement Co. v. McNeilWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Williamson v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API