Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lamping

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1902No. 4094PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon, Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

This suit was instituted by respondent against appellant George B. Lamping. The complaint alleges that respondent is the owner of real and personal property situate in King county, Washington, which is subject to taxation therein, and that he was at all times mentioned in the complaint, and is now, a taxpayer of said county, resident therein; that said appellant was at all times mentioned in the complaint the duly elected, qualified, and acting county auditor of said county; that at all times since the first day of January, 1901, and for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sturgeon v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Commissioners of Leavenworth County v. KellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Hoffman v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Burnett v. MarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Martin v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Northwestern Improvement Co. v. McNeilWashington Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API