Legal Opinion
Russell v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 4, 1930No. 2 Div. 966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The bill sought a construction of a conveyance of timber and injunctive relief preventing -interference with complainant’s agents acting for -them as to said subject-matter.
The conveyance of date of February 19, 1919, contained the following provision, inserted after granting and descriptive clauses:
“To have and to hold unto the party of the second part his heirs and assigns, together with the rights of engress, egress and regress from, on, over and across said land or any part thereof, and the rights to place, construct, use and operate thereon all such rights of way, dirt roads, tram ways,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Long v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Dinkins v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Murphy v. Schuster Springs Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Alabama Corn Mills Co. v. Mobile Docks Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Turk v. TurkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Earle v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Container Corp. of America v. Hornbuckle Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Dunlap v. ThrashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Earle v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983