Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eadus v. Hunter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 37,478Published

1DissentFead, J.

Plaintiffs had verdict of a jury and judgment in action for damages for conversion of an oil and gas lease. Defendants contend verdict for them should have been directed on the ground of ratification or estoppel and also that the court erred in refusing their requests to charge.

August 13,1928, plaintiffs owned five acres of land by the entireties and another three and a half acres were owned by Eadus and occupied by plaintiffs as their homestead. They executed an oil and gas lease to defendant Hunter, who took and held for himself, Gage, and one Moyer. The latter negotiated the lease but was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daggett v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Eadus v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Cronkhite v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API