Legal Opinion

Russell v. City of Bessemer

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1923No. 6 Div. 240PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

The petitioner was tried and convicted of violation of section 7, Ordinance No. 385, of the city of Bessemer, commonly known as the “Prohibition Ordinance,” and which reads as follows:

“That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, to permit or allow any one to have, possess, operate, or locate on his premises any apparatus, plant or structure for the distilling or manufacturing of prohibited liquors and beverages or any of them within the city of Bessemer or within the police juris* diction thereof, and when such apparatus,, plant or structure is found upon such premises the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte McKivettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. City of Bessemer v. EidgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Ex parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Ex parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. City of Fort PayneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Zavelo v. City of AnnistonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API