Legal Opinion

Howell v. City of Fort Payne

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1944No. 7 Div. 796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

This cause had its origin in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Fort Payne, where appellant was tried and convicted for the violation of a city ordinance. He appealed to the County Court of DeKalb County, where he was again tried upon complaint filed by the city attorney, charging the appellant with the possession of prohibited liquors as denounced by said city ordinance.

Notice of appeal to this court was given November 16, 1943.

The appellant has failed to comply with Act No. 461, General Acts, Ala., 1943, p. 423, effective September 1, 1943, Code 1940, Tit. 7, §§ 827(1)-827(6).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. City of TuscaloosaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Peabody v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Ex Parte WilliamsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Russell v. City of BessemerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Zavelo v. City of AnnistonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stinson v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. SneadAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Cotney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API