Legal Opinion

Gorski v. Dickson City Borough School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1955No. Appeal, No. 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by.

Ervin, J.,

This is-an appeal by' defendants from a decree of the lower • court' dismissing exceptions to the court’s judgment in a mandamus, action. . At an appellant board meeting on August 28, 1929, appellee, Millicent Mikulski Gorski, together with three other ■ teachers, Mary Reed Reis, Rachel Rosenstein and' Margaret McHale, were hired as teachers. On March 1, 1930; appellants hired one Lottie Safinowski &s. a substitute *161teacher and thereafter appointed her as a regular teacher to commence in September 1930.

Except for the dates of hiring, all five teachers held the same type…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Tanenbaum v. D'AscenzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. State Civil Service Commission & DesikacharCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Carver v. Upper Darby Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Appeal of KahleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. City of Jackson v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Alwine v. Board of School Directors of Richland School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API