Gorski v. Dickson City Borough School District
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by.
Ervin, J.,
This is-an appeal by' defendants from a decree of the lower • court' dismissing exceptions to the court’s judgment in a mandamus, action. . At an appellant board meeting on August 28, 1929, appellee, Millicent Mikulski Gorski, together with three other ■ teachers, Mary Reed Reis, Rachel Rosenstein and' Margaret McHale, were hired as teachers. On March 1, 1930; appellants hired one Lottie Safinowski &s. a substitute *161teacher and thereafter appointed her as a regular teacher to commence in September 1930.
Except for the dates of hiring, all five teachers held the same type…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Tanenbaum v. D'AscenzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. State Civil Service Commission & DesikacharCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Carver v. Upper Darby Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Appeal of KahleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- City of Jackson v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Alwine v. Board of School Directors of Richland School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.