Legal Opinion

American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. McDiamid

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 7 Div. 471PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

On the undisputed evidence before the trial court we can find no basis for any recovery of compensation by plaintiff. Manifestly, if plaintiff can recover at all, it must be either under the terms of the written contract made between him and defendant on January 7, 1920, and remaining in full force and effect during the period of his alleged service, or it must be under a new contract, expressed or implied, for the performance of the services alleged to have been rendered.

Plaintiff’s contention is that the written contract of January 7, 1920, expired at the end of 1921, and that his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hodges v. SublettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Meaher v. PomeroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Brown Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Centraal Stikstof Verkoopkanter, N. v. V. Walsh Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Moore v. Merchants & Planters BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Gilbert v. Gwin-McCollum Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Cowan v. Martin HuckabySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API