Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1933No. 4-2936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

Suit to recover a judgment for $894.44 and to foreclose a chattel mortgage was instituted in the chancery court by appellee, a foreign corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling linotype machines, against appellant, who had purchased a secondhand linotype machine from it. At the time of the institution of the suit, a balance of $894.44 was due on the machine, which appellant refused to pay. The notes evidencing the balance and the chattel mortgage given on the machine to secure them were made the basis of the suit.

The defense interposed to the suit by appellant was that the contract was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. L. D. Powell Co. v. RountreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Linograph Company v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roark v. American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. American Soda Fountain Co. v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. North v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. American Soda Fountain Co. v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API