Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1985No. B007211PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Petitioner Jimmy Rodgers (applicant) seeks review of the decision of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that a compromise and release agreement precludes applicant from claiming benefits for injury sustained by him in a rehabilitation program implemented pursuant to Labor Code section 139.5.

We hold that the Board’s decision must be annulled, because the employer and the insurer are obligated to pay ordinary compensation for an injury sustained by an employee while engaged in a rehabilitation program.

Factual Background and Procedural History

Applicant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Webb v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Claxton v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lexington Insurance Co. v. American Healthcare ProvidersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Huffman v. Koppers Co. Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Washington County School District v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Newton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API