Legal Opinion

Newton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1993No. A059000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHELAN, J.

Petitioner Richard M. Newton (applicant) seeks review of the decision of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that his claim for workers’ compensation benefits for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained due to problems encountered while participating in a vocational rehabilitation (VR) program implemented by respondent employer Cal-Wood Door/Weyerhaeuser Claims (employer) is precluded by the statute of limitations.

We hold that applicant’s alleged psychiatric injury is not barred by the five-year statutory time limitations on the Board’s continuing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Webb v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Granite Construction Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Applied Materials v. Workers' Comp Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Brooks v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API