Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Grady

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1992No. 92-0497-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

We review the recommendation of the referee that Attorney Jeffrey J. Grady be publicly reprimanded for professional misconduct consisting of his failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client and his failure to cooperate with the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) in its investigation into that conduct.

We determine that the recommended public reprimand is appropriate discipline to impose for Attorney Grady's professional misconduct. While his failure to pursue his clients'…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API