Legal Opinion
United States v. Ryan Craig
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 17, 2012No. 11-1697PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a discrete question arising under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA), 28 U.S.C. § 2465: does CAFRA entitle a convicted criminal to interest on an award of excess funds returned to him after he satisfies a restitution order? We hold that it does not.
I
Following his federal criminal convictions for wire fraud and failure to appear at trial, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ordered Ryan James Craig to pay $12,411 in restitution and a $300 special assessment. 1 The Government sought…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Esther Bein and William BeinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Michael Ikelionwu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gerardo Serrano v. U.S. Customs and BorderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Nader Aldossari v. Joseph RippCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Patrick McGrogan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.