Legal Opinion
Purely Driven Products, LLC v. Chillovino, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 22, 2016No. Case No. 15-00982 CBM (ASx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HON. CONSUELO MARSHALL, United States District Judge
The matter before the Court is Defendants Chillovino, LLC, Cigdem Harms, and Microtex Global Manufacturing (collectively, “Defendants’”) Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(1) (the “Motion”).1 (Dkt. No. 21.)
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs applied to register their CHILLAVINO mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office *1018(“USPTO”) on June 5, 2015. (FAC ¶ 15.) Plaintiffs’ mark was published for opposition by the USPTO on November 11, 2014, and is currently being opposed by Defendants. (Id.) Plaintiffs’ First…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rhoades v. Avon Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- HSK, LLC v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017