Legal Opinion

Sahadi v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 21, 2003No. 02-73734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES AND PST SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT LINDA CASCANTE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COHN, Senior District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is an employment case under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (FMLA). Plaintiff Mary Ann Sa-hadi (Sahadi) is suing defendants Per-Se Technologies (Per-Se), PST Service’s Inc. 1 and Linda Cascante (Cascante) claiming that she was wrongfully terminated from her employment for attendance violations. Sahadi says some of her…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Michael Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steve Aubuchon v. Knauf Fiberglass, GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Fritz v. Phillips Service Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Robinson v. T-MOBILEDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Aubuchon, Steve v. Knauf FiberglassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API