Legal Opinion

Howell v. Roueche

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1955No. 6 Div. 780Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

STAKELY, Justice.

Our attention has been called to the fact that the appellee’s brief on the original *88submission was filed sixteen days after submission of the cause. We are asked in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 38, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, to disregard the application for rehearing filed by the appellee. We have a discretion, however, in applying Rule 38, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Magouirk, 31 Ala.App. 5, 11 So.2d 462, certiorari denied 243 Ala. 626, 11 So.2d 466, and feel that the ends of justice would be better served if we consider the application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MagouirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Henley v. LollarAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MagouirkAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API