Legal Opinion

Henley v. Lollar

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1950No. 6 Div. 845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

In the court below the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant in a suit for property damages and personal injuries sustained by the former in an automobile collision.

Appellant’s counsel in brief cogently urges that the defendant below was due the general affirmative charge. The insistence is based primarily on the position that under the undisputed evidence the appellee was guilty of contributory negligence.

It affirmatively appears that the record does not contain all the evidence. A photograph was taken of the appellee’s automobile soon after the collision. This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Kabase v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. York v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Alabama Terminal R. R. v. BennsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Smith v. LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Starkey v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Farmers Co-op. Warehouse Ass'n v. ShiklesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Howell v. RouecheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API