Legal Opinion
Graham Bros. Aktiebolag v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action upon marine insurance certificate for loss occasioned at sea.
1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.
The complaint in this case, in which eight causes of action are set forth, is based upon certain insurance certificates issued by the defendant company, “ to the order of one A. J. Berg or order.” For some years A. J. Berg has had an open policy of marine insurance with the defendant company. A recovery is sought on each certificate as a separate cause of action. The certificates were issued on March 11, 1919, to cover the shipment by Berg of a number of automobiles on the steamship Keresaspa from New York to Gothenberg, Sweden. They provide that the loss, if any, shall be payable “ to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Syracuse Lighting Co. v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Curnen v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Seidenspinner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rego Building Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Armada Supply Inc. v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- American Fabrics Co. v. BenedictNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Graham Bros. Aktiebolag v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- George Colon & Co. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929