Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Caillot

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

On October 5, 1998, a jury convicted the defendants, Herby Caillot and Manuel R. Santos, of murder in the first degree, as joint venturers, by reason of deliberate premeditation. After initially denying postconviction relief, the trial judge granted the defendants a new trial, finding that the improper closing argument by the prosecutor concerning motive and newly discovered ballistics evidence regarding the handguns used in the murder, considered together, meant that “justice may not have been done” within the meaning of Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001). The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Pytou HeangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SylviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. RidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. WardsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API