Legal Opinion
Glielmi v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1984PublishedCited by 19 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
*666OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The factual setting out of which this appeal arises is described in the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 663). We respond to the legal contentions advanced by appellant contractor in our court.
The jury was charged that the owner-trustees and the tenant were to be considered a single unit for purposes of determining liability to the injured plaintiff. There was evidence from which the jury could properly have found that both were absolutely liable under subdivision 1 of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Kemp v. Lakelands Precast, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Glielmi v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harris v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Guzman v. L.M.P. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Guillory v. Nautilus Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Tate v. Clancy-Cullen Storage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kerr v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.