Legal Opinion

In re Nakia L.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1993PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

A delinquency petition was filed against respondent on May 21, 1989, alleging that he committed acts which, if done by an adult, would have constituted attempted robbery and attempted assault. As required by Family Court Act § 340.1 (2), a fact-finding hearing was scheduled to take place within 60 days of his initial appearance. However, on July 18th, respondent requested that the fact-finding hearing be adjourned beyond the 60-day period because his attorney had to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In re Randy K.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In re Aaron J.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In re Vincent M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Matter of VincentNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In re Bryant J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re Melvin A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re Satori R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Matter of Jamar A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In re James T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API