Legal Opinion

Treat v. Fortune

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 15, 1852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

On the final accounting of the administrator, several objections were raised by the guardian of the next of kin. The most important of these related to a personal claim of the administrator against the intestate, for the expenses of an expedition to Texas, which is now for the first time presented, though the administrator has been called to account before.

The transaction occurred, as alleged by the administrator, between the 25th of January 1836, and the 3d of November 1838. Thirteen years expired before he presented *117his demand for adjudication. The guardian of the next of kin,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hosack v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1837

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Willcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Rosevele Frocks, Inc. v. SommersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948
  3. Wood v. RuscoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880
  4. In re the Estate of RyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WaughNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API