Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Foscarinis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 8, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoon, J.
Succinctly put, the question presented here is whether a refusal of an offer of employment by a person not then claiming benefits, may be the basis of disqualification under section 593 (subd. 2) of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18), when he thereafter applies for benefits.
Claimant had been temporarily employed for a short period of time before Christmas in 1951 as a toy reassembler. Thereafter *477he worked for about five months for another employer and was laid off on September 25,1952. On October 3,1952, his previous employer in the toy business offered him the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Claim of Gilmore v. Preferred Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re Hubsch Post No. 596, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U. S. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re the Claim of BersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. LibowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of BehnkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of FoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Lockport Union-Sun & Journal, Inc. v. PreischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n, Local 94 v. BeekmanNew York Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.