Legal Opinion

Pruett v. Pruett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2009No. SD 29154PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Presiding Judge.

Wife 1 appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage. She complains that the trial court struck her pleadings and kept her from offering evidence of her alleged need for maintenance. She also challenges an order for forced sale of her home unless she refinances within 60 days. The latter point has merit. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

Point I — Striking Pleadings/Precluding Maintenance Evidence

Husband petitioned for dissolution and Wife answered, seeking maintenance, in late 2005. In early 2006, Husband served initial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ward v. United Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Hileman v. HilemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In Re Marriage of WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In re the Marriage of LindemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Carlson v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scott v. Potter Electric Signal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State of Missouri v. Claude ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. Duncan v. DempseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Erickson v. EricksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. L.R.S. v. C.A.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API