Legal Opinion

Oaksmith Vs. Dist. Ct. (Rosas)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2021No. 81706Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TAYLER OAKSMITH, No. 81706 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN MED AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE CRISTINA D. APR 1 & 2021 SILVA, DISTRICT JUDGE, .711 A. E'P.OWN CLERK OrUP<Livira CO Respondents, BY DePzife CLERK and CESAR RoSAS; AND LOYA INSURANCE COMPANY, INTERVENOR, Real Parties in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges several district court orders in a personal injury action. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Estate LoMastro Ex Rel. LoMastro v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Liapis v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hamlett v. ReynoldsNevada Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API