Legal Opinion
United States v. Sargent County Water Resource District
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided April 6, 1992No. Civ. No. A3-88-175PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEBB, Chief Judge.
On January 31, 1992, the court heard oral arguments on the United States’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 101), Sargent County Water Resource District’s [the County] motion to dismiss (docket entry # 103), and Moore Engineering, Inc.’s [Moore], motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 104). The State of North Dakota joins the County and Moore in their motions (docket entry # 115).1 Also before the court is the United States’ motion to bifurcate into separate trials the issues of liability and damages (docket entry # 97).
This is a dispute…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Almont Shipping Co. v. RuffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Leslie Salt Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Montgomery Environmental Coalition v. FriDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Love v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. KovichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Jones v. E.R. Snell Contractor, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- In Re CarstenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1997
- Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. StiglichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
- Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.