Legal Opinion

State v. Wiegand

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 2003No. 87,357, 87,358, 87,359, 87,360, 87,361PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This matter is before us for review of a Court of Appeals’ decision remanding this case with directions to the trial court to consider placement of Steven Wiegand II in a Community Intermediate Sanction Center (CISC). State v. Wiegand, No. 87,357, unpublished opinion filed October 18, 2002.

Wiegand appealed the imposition of a prison sanction after his probation was revoked in several cases and he failed to successfully complete the Labette Correctional Conservation Camp (Labette). Wiegand argued the trial court erred in failing to consider…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MinceySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. James P. Kiernan v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. OsterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. BeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API