Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baughman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1984No. 317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing, after a hearing, appellant’s petition filed under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9541 et seq. On appeal appellant raises several issues, only one of which is properly before us.

Appellant first argues that the sentence imposed was illegal. On March 17, 1971, the defendant was sentenced to a period of incarceration of ten (10) years flat; no minimum being stated. Appellant contends that he is entitled to resentencing at which time both a minimum and maximum sentence must be stated on the record.

At the time of sentencing 19 P.S. § 1057…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. ZillgittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. AeschbacherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. SmickloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SmickloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API