Legal Opinion

United States v. Foy

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2011No. 09-3314PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

In 2009, a jury found defendant-appellant Shevel Foy guilty of: (1) conspiring to manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, or to distribute cocaine base and/or cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii), (b)(l)(A)(iii), 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2;…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-Wah, United States of America v. Lam Kwong-WahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Jwuan MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Chedowry ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. McKeighanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API