Legal Opinion
Kansas Pipeline Co. v. 200 Foot by 250 Foot Piece of Land
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 15, 2002No. Civil Action 01-2026-GTVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
This eminent domain action arises out of a lease agreement between Plaintiff Kansas Pipeline Company (“KPC”) and Defendants Herbert and Vonda Landwehr. KPC and its predecessors have leased a parcel of property from the Landwehrs since 1989 and used the property for various functions related to the operation of a natural gas pipeline system. The Land-wehrs terminated the lease, and KPC brought this eminent domain action. KPC asks the court to find that it has eminent domain power to condemn the property and acquire it at its fair market…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Land, Cullman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Certain EasementsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. DecoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Millennium Pipeline Co. v. Certain Permanent & Temporary EasementsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Equitrans, L.P. v. 0.56 Acres More or Less of Permanent EasementDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.