Legal Opinion

Weer v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1918No. 5229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, McIntosh County ; Preslie B. Oole, Judge. Action by J. H. Weer against Harry I-I. Bell and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

The parties to this action will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. The plaintiff, J. H. Weer, instituted this action in the district court of McIntosh county, Okla., against Harry H. Bell and Homer Lee, to recover the possession of a tract of land, damages for the detention thereof, and to cancel certain instruments of record as clouds upon plaintiff’s title. Plaintiff deraigns his title as follows: August 2, 1910, deed from the allottee, Horace Posey, to Frank Posey; September 6, 1910, deed from Frank Posey to J. H. Weer; October 8, 1910, quitclaim deed from Horace Posey to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Day v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keane v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cook v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n v. NewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Horwitz v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API