Naugatuck Railroad v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Applications in the nature of appeals from street paving assessments, taken to the Superior Court in New Haven County where a demurrer to the first and third reasons of appeal was overruled ( Gager, J".), the facts were found and reported by a committee, and judgment in each case was rendered (Robinson, J.') for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, C. J.
These two cases may very properly be considered together. Each is in the nature of an appeal to the Superior Court from an assessment of benefits made by the city of Waterbury against the railroad company on account of the paving of certain city streets, and the questions involved in each case are substantially the same.
The assessment complained of in the first case (No. 6) was made in July, 1890, on account of the paving of Bank Street, and amounted to the sum of $413.83; while that complained of in the second case (No. 2) was made in August, 1892, on account of the paving of Meadow Street,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Town of Madison v. Town of GuilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Appeal of Cohen From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- In the Matter of Chicago and North Western Railway CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- People ex rel. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co. v. WaldorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- City of Barre v. Barre & Chelsea RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.