Legal Opinion

Lick v. Austin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1872No. 1,963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiffs appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Rhodes, J.:

These actions were brought against the Tax Collector to enjoin the sale of certain real estate for the non-payment of *594taxes. It is alleged in the complaints that the real estate, when it was assessed, was subject to certain mortgages; that the Assessor was duly informed of that fact, but that he assessed the real estate without regard to, or making any deduction on account of, the mortgages; that applications were made to the Board of Equalization to reduce the assessment in each case, on account of the mortgages, but the applications were refused; and that in each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. People v. KohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Savings & Loan Society v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Clayton v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Globe Lumber Co. v. LockettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. City of Palo Alto v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API