Legal Opinion
Clayton v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1972No. Civ. 38227PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Plaintiffs taxpayers appeal from an adverse judgment in an action for a refund of part of property taxes paid for the 1967-1968 fiscal year on real property located in the City of Whittier.
The property in question is improved with a department store leased to the May Company for 30 years starting in August 1965. The lease agreement gives the May Company an option to renew the lease for 60 additional one-year terms. In other words, should it choose to exercise its options, the lessee has the right to exclusive possession of the realty until the year 2055.
Boyd White, a deputy…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Carlson v. Assessment Appeals Board ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Wynwood Apartments, Inc. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Dennis v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.