Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fenton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1985No. 84-5786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

474 U.S. 104 (1985)

MILLER

v.

FENTON, SUPERINTENDENT, RAHWAY STATE PRISON, ET AL.

No. 84-5786.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 16, 1985

Decided December 3, 1985

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Paul Martin Klein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Thomas S. Smith and Claudia Van Wyk.

Anne C. Paskow, Deputy Attorney General of New Jersey, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General, and Allan J. Nodes and Debra L. Stone, Deputy Attorneys General.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · O'ConnorJustice O'Connor

Under 28 U. S. C. §…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Gasca-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Andre Burton v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
  4. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API