Legal Opinion

Contractors of Engineering & Manufacturing of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Williams Automatic Sprinkler Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1974No. 46475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Judge:

In December, 1967, one Harms, apparently as the owner of Oklahoma City’s Lincoln Lanes Building, entered into a contract to provide this building with fire protection by the installation in it of a sprinkler system to be installed by the Ap-pellee, usually hereinafter referred to as “defendant”.

After the installation had been completed and accepted by the building owner in February, 1968, freezing weather subsequently occurred in December of that year and some of the sprinkler system’s pipes in the building’s attic froze and broke open, allowing the building’s interior beneath…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Littlehale v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Lancaster v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Russell v. Arthur Whitcomb, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  5. Leininger v. Stearns-Roger Manufacturing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. CITICORP ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Soave v. National Velour Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API