Legal Opinion

Russell v. Arthur Whitcomb, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 29, 1956No. 4470PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

Subject to certain exceptions, it is the general rule supported by a majority of jurisdictions that an independent building or construction contractor is not liable for negligent injury to third persons occurring after the work has been completed and accepted by the owner or employer. Smith v. Claude Neon Lights, Inc., 110 N. J. L. 326; 2 Shearman & Redfield, Negligence (Rev. ed.) s. 267; anno. 13 A. L. R. (2d) 191. While various reasons have been advanced to explain the general rule the most common one is that control has passed from the independent contractor to the owner upon acceptance of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Berg v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cunningham v. T. A. Gillespie Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Memphis Asphalt & Paving Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Wright v. Holland Furnace Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Tipton v. ClowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API