Legal Opinion

Wingad v. John Deere & Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 13, 1994No. 94-0056PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

John Deere & Co., doing business under the assumed name of Deere & Company (John Deere) appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Shelley Wingad. The jury found John Deere causally negligent in a work-related accident that injured Wingad. John Deere contends that the trial court erred by adopting Wingad's modifications to the standard jury instructions and a nonpattern instruction because the changes disrupted the proper balance that must be maintained in jury instructions. It also submits that one of the jury instructions was not supported by the evidence admitted at trial.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Better Building Maintenance of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Duello v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Dawson, Meredith v. Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  5. Dawson, Meredith v. Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API