Legal Opinion

Redd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1910No. 2393PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of LaG-range— Judge Harwell. January 1, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

The defendants were prosecuted under the Penal Code of 1895, §390, which provides, among other things, that “any person who shall be guilty of open lewdness, or any notorious act of public indecency, tending to debauch the morals/5 shall be punished as for a misdemeanor. ' The charge is that the defendants were guilty of a notorious act of public indecencjr, tending to debauch the morals, in that thejr, in a public place, adjacent to a highway and in the presence of a lady and several children, caused a bull and a cow to copulate. The proof was that these two men, having been entrusted with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McJunkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Ardery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State v. ApplingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  4. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Brigman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. RingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API