O'Neill v. O'Neill
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Van Winkle, A. M.
1. On this appeal, I am called upon to give my reasons for the Chancellor’s order of August 25th, 1939, made by him on my advice. First, I notice that counsel have made a stipulation of facts, which shows the salary and secured debts of the husband on two specified dates, and that, apparently, this stipulation is looked upon by counsel for the wife, as all that needs to be considered in connection with the petition of the complainant for an increase of support on this appeal. There are many other significant things not at all in any way reflected in this stipulation or…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Kressly v. KresslySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Mani v. ManiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Turi v. TuriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.