Legal Opinion

Mani v. Mani

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 6, 2005PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

The appeal in this family law case presents the issue of whether marital fault is a factor in the determination of alimony and the award of counsel fees. We hold that marital fault is irrelevant to alimony except in two narrow instances: eases in which the fault has affected the parties’ economic life and cases in which the fault so violates societal norms that continuing the economic bonds between the parties would confound notions of simple justice. The former may be considered in the calculation of alimony and the latter in connection with the initial determination of whether alimony…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Seidman v. Clifton Savings BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Gnall v. Gnall (073321)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. Cathleen Quinn v. David J. Quinn (074411)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  4. Reese v. WeisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  5. Clark v. ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API